Immigration Wars Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Immigration Wars - Essay Example However, the under utilization of pathos can be a highly effective tool in delivery of an argument when seeking to avoid an overly emotive response in politically charged subject matter. It is well known in the written rhetorical argument the writer is wise to embrace the concepts of logos, ethos, and pathos. The more difficult the subject matter, the more critical it is to master these rhetorical elements. Eduardo Proctor tackled a difficult topic in an aspect of illegal immigration. In Proctor’s lack of pathos, he successfully demonstrates the effectiveness of coupling logos and ethos as standalone tools of the rhetorical argument. Eduardo Proctor’s primary argumentative focus in the â€Å"Cost of Illegal Immigration May Be Less Than Meets the Eye† was logos. Proctor not only established credibility with his apt usage of statistics, he used them to maintain his credibility throughout the article. The best application of logos is found be in the statistical comp arison of wage loss percentages between that of California and Ohio during the years of illegal immigration surges. He clearly identified that while illegal immigration critics cited wage declines in California, Proctor competently demonstrated Ohio, which has little to no illegal immigration saw nearly three times the low-income wage loss in the same period. By doing this early in the write, Proctor effectively attracted attention by using factual data that many may not have been aware. This effective use of logos literally forced the reader to continue hearing his argument. While starting the argument with statistics, Proctor was hardly done with logos. He continually reinforced credibility by repeatedly referring to the dates and time line in question. Why was this effective? This hit the mark for Proctor because he was referring to a period of spanning some 25 years. An important aspect of this article is the fact that the period in question is not a snapshot. This was originall y introduced in the second sentence of the article because Proctor identified this as the key element of his argument. Proctor effectively applied the statistical date reference by referring to it no less than six times. He further built his credibility with this statistic by subtly referring to it in varying manners. By stating it as â€Å"quarter decade† and â€Å"since the 1980’s† allowed the reader to grasp the scope of time without losing interest through redundancy. Proctor was also effective in his use of quotes to build credibility. He quoted well-identified, credible sources. To establish his sources, he listed them by name, profession as it pertained to his argument, and organization. Proctor utilized appropriate quotes to support his argument without belaboring the quotes with inappropriate or off topic information. The quotes were precise, direct, and factually based. To achieve success in this, Proctor identified the individuals he cited, as â€Å" economists† to establish they were on the same level of those from which he was dissenting. In quoting one of the economists he cited, "’Illegal immigration had a little bit of a role reinforcing adverse trends for the least advantaged, he said, but there are much stronger forces operating over the last 25 years.’" This was an ideal quote because it both builds credibility and solidifies Proctor’s use of statistics. The element of logos has been highly effective in this article. However, Proctor did not

Law Assignment on Tribunals Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Law on Tribunals - Assignment Example In absence of tribunals, disputes among nations would possibly descend into war, economic and human suffering and unsustainable exploitation of global shared resources. Lastly, non-compliance by member countries, non-membership by important countries and a lack of sufficient power to impose resolutions are demerits of tribunals. Introduction Tribunals have gained prominence in the contemporary world ever since the Nuremberg trials for war crimes following World War II. According to Posner and Yoo (2004), a tribunal is a panel of individuals given the responsibility of resolving a dispute between or among states based on international law. Tribunals offer third party dispute resolution or international adjudication, and have different levels on a dependency continuum ranging from the more dependent arbitrator to the less dependent court. Tribunals have been seen as an acceptable way to deal with international disputes, as seen by the pressure on the UN (United Nations) to set up an ad hoc international criminal tribunal (Schabas, 2006). This momentum towards establishing tribunals informs enquiry into the topic, especially given their potential to solve state-state disputes and prevent escalation possibly averting world-scale warfare. The current study investigates the importance of tribunals among two or more nations and the influence of cultural differences on international tribunals, the possible consequences of absence of tribunals and the demerits of the tribunal system. 1. The Importance of Tribunals among Two or More Nations Tribunals occupy an important position in international law and inter-state dispute resolution due to a number of reasons. First, disputes between or among nations are complex in nature and may rapidly escalate into damaged relations, proving difficult to repair. Such disputes are also of a large scale, with the capacity to result in socio-economic and political distress of the citizenry of the involved nations. Darby (2005) provides case examples of some of the inter-country disputes that have occurred in history. The disputes range from disagreements among European nations for the partitioning of Africa for colonization, complex trade disputes and conflicts over boundaries, waterways and international waters. In such cases, the nature and implications of the disputes add significance. For instance, the disputes entail vested political and economic interests and considerations on historical relations among two or more nations. In terms of consequences, warfare, human suffering and disruption of trade may ensue if interventions are unavailable. Inter-state tribunals offer a highly acceptable way out of such complex situations and avert the undesirable consequences that may ensue. The importance of tribunals in settling such disputes also lies in their nature: unlike ordinary courts of adjudication, tribunals do not suppress the voluntary element while making the involuntary element of case submission predominant (Darby, 2005). The tribunal system balances adjudicative and arbitrative roles unlike ordinary courts of law, making it suitable for the complexities of international disputes. This makes tribunals acceptable and averts or repairs any damages in inter-state relations. Tribunals are also sufficiently flexible to cater for different situations. For instance, interstate tribunals provide control to the states, which are unitary